Resume builds a holiday to be fried squid hutch division commander refuses to ob
From;    Author:Stand originally

Because what dispatch of Chinese court net fills findings of resume and company to have discrepancy and working performance was not obtained approbate, mr Wang is dismissed by place meal company, employ both sides causes labor dispute dispute with respect to the matters concerned such as salary settle accounts from this. Recently, court of the 2nd intermediate people is opposite Shanghai this case makes final judgment adjudicate, the reason of gentleman of king of termless dismiss an employee of cognizance meal company holds water, need not pay any salary compensation to its again.
In July 2005, mr Wang is located in invite applications for a job of limited company of management of water of the 4 feed on calm way holds the position of Shanghai chef is chief, RMB of bilateral agreement monthly wages 7000 yuan, but did not sign labor contract at this point. Mr Wang is filling in when staff invite applications for a job is expressed, mention expressly in resume “2000—2004 year ” of hutch division commander holds the post of in small austral public house and sign on this watch acceptance: “ above place fills content all true, if have false, be willing to accept termless dismiss processing. ” in addition, mr Wang is signed additionally still imprint him “ is in " staff invite applications for a job is expressed " in the content that fills in is belonged to completely solid, if have,conceal, be willing to accept a company to allow to punish the affirmatory book of ” where. On August 22, the company is oral and repulsive Mr Wang.

October 2005, mr Wang arbitrates to labor orgnaization appeal, requirement meal company pays differential, overwork salary and did not shift to an earlier date 30 days to notify dismiss an employee replace salary to wait add up to more than yuan 10 thousand. Arbitral orgnaization replaces salary to 7000 yuan in subsequently adjudication one gives support. Meal company refuses to obey, to forensic to lodge a complaint.

Say in the petition that meal company submits to the court, the company is because of Mr Wang in watch of invite applications for a job the resume that fills in and action hold the position of hutch division commander with its, but do not have the qualification that holds the position of hutch division commander and capacity in king of the discovery after try out. And classics investigation, wang Suo calls holding the position of the circumstance that chef of ” of small austral public house grows “ is false, reason makes dismiss decide. In addition, the invite applications for a job that fill in in Mr Wang and signs is expressed and the relevant content of termless dismiss already was stated in affirmatory book, because this company need not shift to an earlier date 30 days to king make dismiss announcement, also need not pay to replace salary that month.

Forensic first instance supported the litigant request of meal company, mr Wang is satisfied to city 2 quadrangle put forward to appeal.
上一页12 下一页